skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
Economics of New Media, 2009
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Gimme a 'G' ...
Someone may have already posted this, but just in case ...
Ten Things Google Has Taught Us
. I dig No. 9.
1 comment:
Alice Ju(小米)
October 27, 2009 at 11:14 PM
I guess my engineer friends will vote for this "Treat engineers as kings."
Reply
Delete
Replies
Reply
Add comment
Load more...
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
12
(1)
9
(1)
advertisement
(2)
Advertising
(3)
aggregators
(1)
AJR
(2)
alternative
(1)
ambient news
(1)
anderson
(1)
AP
(1)
assignment
(1)
Associated Press
(2)
attention economy
(2)
Avery
(18)
Belo
(1)
bias
(1)
bing
(1)
Blodget
(4)
candy
(1)
capitalism
(1)
central server
(1)
chapter 7
(1)
Chris Anderson
(2)
chyi
(1)
circulation
(2)
clayton christensen
(1)
Collective
(1)
Comcast
(1)
Community Impact
(1)
consumer behavior
(1)
Craig Newmark
(2)
Craigslist
(1)
Cringely
(4)
Cringley
(1)
CS Monitor
(1)
davenport
(1)
David Carr
(1)
differentiation
(1)
Digital native
(1)
disruptive innovation
(2)
Economist
(2)
Epic 2015
(1)
ESPN
(1)
Farhi
(1)
fragmentation
(1)
free content
(2)
Free vs. fee
(1)
freeconomics
(1)
Gauntlett
(1)
GE
(1)
Ghosh
(1)
google
(7)
HMF
(7)
HMF and Cringely
(1)
HMF Chapter 11
(1)
incidental exposure
(1)
Industry Map
(1)
inferior good
(1)
information overload
(1)
instructor
(6)
iris chyi
(1)
James Moore
(1)
jarvis
(1)
journal article critique
(2)
Journalist
(1)
Kang
(12)
Kate. West
(1)
Kate.West
(11)
Kelly
(18)
Kelly's portfolio
(1)
kim
(2)
Len Downie
(1)
littlerice
(12)
Long Tail
(2)
Longtail
(2)
mainstream
(1)
Malcolm Gladwell
(3)
management
(1)
media choice
(1)
media creation
(1)
media stock competition
(1)
micro payment
(1)
micropayments
(1)
microsoft
(2)
mini-laptops
(1)
Myllylahti
(1)
netbooks
(1)
new economic models
(1)
new media studies
(2)
New York Times
(2)
News Corp.
(1)
newspaper
(4)
newspaper project
(1)
newspapers
(5)
no business model? sung woo
(2)
NY Times
(1)
online news
(1)
online-only
(1)
ownership
(1)
paid content
(1)
participation business model
(1)
Patterson
(1)
people
(1)
Pete
(15)
Picard
(8)
Picard chap 8
(1)
Portfolio
(4)
Prensky
(1)
print
(1)
Putnam
(1)
quality
(1)
related posting
(1)
research critique
(3)
response
(1)
Robert G. Picard
(1)
Sandra
(15)
scarcity
(1)
selective exposure
(1)
Sinking Ships
(1)
skepticism
(1)
Stepp
(5)
Stock Picks
(1)
Stocks
(5)
Sung Woo
(10)
sungwoo
(1)
surplus
(2)
theory of the firm
(1)
Thurman
(1)
time to panic
(1)
Ting
(10)
tools of production
(1)
trust
(1)
Twitter
(1)
un-netbooks
(1)
Washington Post
(1)
Web 2.0
(1)
Web measures and Google
(3)
web only
(1)
Wired
(1)
yonghwan
(11)
Blog Archive
▼
2009
(172)
►
11/29 - 12/06
(9)
►
11/15 - 11/22
(1)
►
11/08 - 11/15
(2)
►
11/01 - 11/08
(1)
▼
10/25 - 11/01
(20)
Is online news really an inferior good?
Another survey about paid news content.
When news become public goods?
Why can't we adapt to the Moore's Law?
Innovation is always going to lead to new and impr...
Who drives the technology evolution? Customers or ...
Is Google really gate-keeping?
Gimme a 'G' ...
News find audience
The fate of San Francisco Chronicle
Zero-sum game for attention
Beneficial or not? (for markets or for consumers)
The fantasy of the digital market
Music and newspaper industries are scarily similar
The scarcity of time and energy... (or ability)
Circulation drops again on newspapr price hikes
Does the "Long Tail" stand at odds with "Free?"
Umm, What About My Candy?
Record labels need to wake up
Newspaper model reversing?
►
10/18 - 10/25
(12)
►
10/11 - 10/18
(3)
►
10/04 - 10/11
(15)
►
09/27 - 10/04
(18)
►
09/20 - 09/27
(28)
►
09/13 - 09/20
(20)
►
09/06 - 09/13
(26)
►
08/30 - 09/06
(17)
Followers
I guess my engineer friends will vote for this "Treat engineers as kings."
ReplyDelete