skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
Economics of New Media, 2009
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Kang-Media Stock choice
My choice:
1. Daum Communication Corporation (South Korea)
Profile
Profile
Summary
Research
Analyst recommendation
Analyst recommendation
2.
Google
3. The Washington Post Company
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
12
(1)
9
(1)
advertisement
(2)
Advertising
(3)
aggregators
(1)
AJR
(2)
alternative
(1)
ambient news
(1)
anderson
(1)
AP
(1)
assignment
(1)
Associated Press
(2)
attention economy
(2)
Avery
(18)
Belo
(1)
bias
(1)
bing
(1)
Blodget
(4)
candy
(1)
capitalism
(1)
central server
(1)
chapter 7
(1)
Chris Anderson
(2)
chyi
(1)
circulation
(2)
clayton christensen
(1)
Collective
(1)
Comcast
(1)
Community Impact
(1)
consumer behavior
(1)
Craig Newmark
(2)
Craigslist
(1)
Cringely
(4)
Cringley
(1)
CS Monitor
(1)
davenport
(1)
David Carr
(1)
differentiation
(1)
Digital native
(1)
disruptive innovation
(2)
Economist
(2)
Epic 2015
(1)
ESPN
(1)
Farhi
(1)
fragmentation
(1)
free content
(2)
Free vs. fee
(1)
freeconomics
(1)
Gauntlett
(1)
GE
(1)
Ghosh
(1)
google
(7)
HMF
(7)
HMF and Cringely
(1)
HMF Chapter 11
(1)
incidental exposure
(1)
Industry Map
(1)
inferior good
(1)
information overload
(1)
instructor
(6)
iris chyi
(1)
James Moore
(1)
jarvis
(1)
journal article critique
(2)
Journalist
(1)
Kang
(12)
Kate. West
(1)
Kate.West
(11)
Kelly
(18)
Kelly's portfolio
(1)
kim
(2)
Len Downie
(1)
littlerice
(12)
Long Tail
(2)
Longtail
(2)
mainstream
(1)
Malcolm Gladwell
(3)
management
(1)
media choice
(1)
media creation
(1)
media stock competition
(1)
micro payment
(1)
micropayments
(1)
microsoft
(2)
mini-laptops
(1)
Myllylahti
(1)
netbooks
(1)
new economic models
(1)
new media studies
(2)
New York Times
(2)
News Corp.
(1)
newspaper
(4)
newspaper project
(1)
newspapers
(5)
no business model? sung woo
(2)
NY Times
(1)
online news
(1)
online-only
(1)
ownership
(1)
paid content
(1)
participation business model
(1)
Patterson
(1)
people
(1)
Pete
(15)
Picard
(8)
Picard chap 8
(1)
Portfolio
(4)
Prensky
(1)
print
(1)
Putnam
(1)
quality
(1)
related posting
(1)
research critique
(3)
response
(1)
Robert G. Picard
(1)
Sandra
(15)
scarcity
(1)
selective exposure
(1)
Sinking Ships
(1)
skepticism
(1)
Stepp
(5)
Stock Picks
(1)
Stocks
(5)
Sung Woo
(10)
sungwoo
(1)
surplus
(2)
theory of the firm
(1)
Thurman
(1)
time to panic
(1)
Ting
(10)
tools of production
(1)
trust
(1)
Twitter
(1)
un-netbooks
(1)
Washington Post
(1)
Web 2.0
(1)
Web measures and Google
(3)
web only
(1)
Wired
(1)
yonghwan
(11)
Blog Archive
▼
2009
(172)
►
11/29 - 12/06
(9)
►
11/15 - 11/22
(1)
►
11/08 - 11/15
(2)
►
11/01 - 11/08
(1)
►
10/25 - 11/01
(20)
►
10/18 - 10/25
(12)
►
10/11 - 10/18
(3)
►
10/04 - 10/11
(15)
►
09/27 - 10/04
(18)
►
09/20 - 09/27
(28)
▼
09/13 - 09/20
(20)
Craig is a quiet genius
My conservative portfolio
Still hard to pick
Kang-Media Stock choice
Sung Woo, Stock choice
Snap!
Don't try this at home
One-Hour Online Tutorial
How to not be "cyclical"
Uh...I'm glad we're not really buying stock
Google to share ad revenue from new reader with ne...
Are potential online subscribers already paying?
How do you choose stocks?
What media companies should I buy?
Thank goodness it's not my job
Needs of case study
Decision making for media market
NBC isn't really NBC, see?
Picard readings, the business of media
Financial health of newspapers
►
09/06 - 09/13
(26)
►
08/30 - 09/06
(17)
Followers
No comments:
Post a Comment