skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
Economics of New Media, 2009
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Kang's media stock
As of 9/18
Daum
42.00; 40
Google
491.46; 17
Washington Post
462.50; 3
Walt Disney
28.44; 5
As of 9/21
Gannett
9.74; 11
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
12
(1)
9
(1)
advertisement
(2)
Advertising
(3)
aggregators
(1)
AJR
(2)
alternative
(1)
ambient news
(1)
anderson
(1)
AP
(1)
assignment
(1)
Associated Press
(2)
attention economy
(2)
Avery
(18)
Belo
(1)
bias
(1)
bing
(1)
Blodget
(4)
candy
(1)
capitalism
(1)
central server
(1)
chapter 7
(1)
Chris Anderson
(2)
chyi
(1)
circulation
(2)
clayton christensen
(1)
Collective
(1)
Comcast
(1)
Community Impact
(1)
consumer behavior
(1)
Craig Newmark
(2)
Craigslist
(1)
Cringely
(4)
Cringley
(1)
CS Monitor
(1)
davenport
(1)
David Carr
(1)
differentiation
(1)
Digital native
(1)
disruptive innovation
(2)
Economist
(2)
Epic 2015
(1)
ESPN
(1)
Farhi
(1)
fragmentation
(1)
free content
(2)
Free vs. fee
(1)
freeconomics
(1)
Gauntlett
(1)
GE
(1)
Ghosh
(1)
google
(7)
HMF
(7)
HMF and Cringely
(1)
HMF Chapter 11
(1)
incidental exposure
(1)
Industry Map
(1)
inferior good
(1)
information overload
(1)
instructor
(6)
iris chyi
(1)
James Moore
(1)
jarvis
(1)
journal article critique
(2)
Journalist
(1)
Kang
(12)
Kate. West
(1)
Kate.West
(11)
Kelly
(18)
Kelly's portfolio
(1)
kim
(2)
Len Downie
(1)
littlerice
(12)
Long Tail
(2)
Longtail
(2)
mainstream
(1)
Malcolm Gladwell
(3)
management
(1)
media choice
(1)
media creation
(1)
media stock competition
(1)
micro payment
(1)
micropayments
(1)
microsoft
(2)
mini-laptops
(1)
Myllylahti
(1)
netbooks
(1)
new economic models
(1)
new media studies
(2)
New York Times
(2)
News Corp.
(1)
newspaper
(4)
newspaper project
(1)
newspapers
(5)
no business model? sung woo
(2)
NY Times
(1)
online news
(1)
online-only
(1)
ownership
(1)
paid content
(1)
participation business model
(1)
Patterson
(1)
people
(1)
Pete
(15)
Picard
(8)
Picard chap 8
(1)
Portfolio
(4)
Prensky
(1)
print
(1)
Putnam
(1)
quality
(1)
related posting
(1)
research critique
(3)
response
(1)
Robert G. Picard
(1)
Sandra
(15)
scarcity
(1)
selective exposure
(1)
Sinking Ships
(1)
skepticism
(1)
Stepp
(5)
Stock Picks
(1)
Stocks
(5)
Sung Woo
(10)
sungwoo
(1)
surplus
(2)
theory of the firm
(1)
Thurman
(1)
time to panic
(1)
Ting
(10)
tools of production
(1)
trust
(1)
Twitter
(1)
un-netbooks
(1)
Washington Post
(1)
Web 2.0
(1)
Web measures and Google
(3)
web only
(1)
Wired
(1)
yonghwan
(11)
Blog Archive
▼
2009
(172)
►
11/29 - 12/06
(9)
►
11/15 - 11/22
(1)
►
11/08 - 11/15
(2)
►
11/01 - 11/08
(1)
►
10/25 - 11/01
(20)
►
10/18 - 10/25
(12)
►
10/11 - 10/18
(3)
►
10/04 - 10/11
(15)
►
09/27 - 10/04
(18)
▼
09/20 - 09/27
(28)
Quality, bias, and the future of news
The economics of choice
Advertising and social media: Right on time, and o...
Measurement evolution
Questions for new media
Epic 2015 and the loss of choice
Is new media study more laggard than new media ind...
So is New Media new?
The more, the harder
how to be Win-Win?
Kang's media stock
Ads or no ad? Can it be so arbitrary?
Critical vs. Tech-savvy
Nerd alert
Man, I had a billion hits
Pete's stock picks
Advertising is good for me.
how to measure online traffice?
Why bulletine board is not popular in US?
Next in Google's path is advertising.
Should I buy iPhone?
Sandra's investiment portfolio
The changing of advertising
Google, social media, newspapers and ads
Kelly's portfolio
The libertarian capitalism of Craigslist
How to measure Web traffic and Google
Primer on advertising
►
09/13 - 09/20
(20)
►
09/06 - 09/13
(26)
►
08/30 - 09/06
(17)
Followers
No comments:
Post a Comment