Tuesday, September 29, 2009

My misunderstanding or their mistakes

Economic Growth and Advertising Expenditures in Different Media in Different Countries Richard van der Wurff and Piet Bakker, Robert G. Picard, Journal of Media Economics, 21:28-52, 2008

Purpose

It explores the relationships between economic growth (GDP) and advertising expenditures for different media in 21 industrialized countries (all long-time member states of the OECD)

Hypotheses

H1: Advertising intensity (a) increases in time and is higher in countries where (b) the primary sector is less important, (c) the secondary and tertiary sectors are more important, (d) a smaller share of production is exported, and (e) per capita GDP is higher.

H2: Advertising intensity of a single medium (a) is not influenced by the advertising intensity of other media and varies (b) in times as well as with (c) per capita GDP.

H3: The responsiveness of advertising expenditures to changes in GDP is higher for print media (newspapers, magazines) and outdoor advertising than for electronic media (television, radio, and cinema).

H4: The responsiveness of advertising expenditures to changes in GDP is higher in countries where (a) newspapers have a larger share in total advertising expenditures, and (b) advertising intensity is higher.

Results
· Advertising intensity varies considerably across time and countries.
· Newspaper advertising expenditures depend more strongly on economic development.
· GDP predicts ad spending better in countries where newspapers are an important advertising medium.
· GDP predicts ad spending better in countries where a larger proportion of GDP is spent on advertising.

The remaining questions

The weak tie between literature and its actual analysis.
· The authors mentioned the previous findings of the principle of relative constancy and unique
events influencing advertising expenditures; however, they did not analyze directly in this study.
· Regarding the intermedia competition, they considered the potential power of the Internet
Advertising; however, it was not analyzed directly in the study.
· For the first hypothesis, the authors did not mention clearly the influence of the manufactures variables

No clear explanation
· How do we define the long-term and short-term?
· How do we define economic declines and upturns? Any indicators to differentiate or standardize the periods?
· No clear analysis of the intermedia competition; why some media are more seriously affected by economic downtowns than others? The authors are more likely to find the answers from the previous research not their findings.
· What is “advertising cultures”? Does the advertising intensity or expenditures determine the advertising culture? Any factors?
· So….what..? why did we get that results? No explanation.

No comments:

Post a Comment