skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
Economics of New Media, 2009
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Two stories on multi-platform audience measurement
http://www.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idUSTRE59014820091001
http://www.multichannel.com/article/339867-Nielsen_TV_Everywhere_Views_Could_Be_Added_To_Total_TV_Ratings.php
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
12
(1)
9
(1)
advertisement
(2)
Advertising
(3)
aggregators
(1)
AJR
(2)
alternative
(1)
ambient news
(1)
anderson
(1)
AP
(1)
assignment
(1)
Associated Press
(2)
attention economy
(2)
Avery
(18)
Belo
(1)
bias
(1)
bing
(1)
Blodget
(4)
candy
(1)
capitalism
(1)
central server
(1)
chapter 7
(1)
Chris Anderson
(2)
chyi
(1)
circulation
(2)
clayton christensen
(1)
Collective
(1)
Comcast
(1)
Community Impact
(1)
consumer behavior
(1)
Craig Newmark
(2)
Craigslist
(1)
Cringely
(4)
Cringley
(1)
CS Monitor
(1)
davenport
(1)
David Carr
(1)
differentiation
(1)
Digital native
(1)
disruptive innovation
(2)
Economist
(2)
Epic 2015
(1)
ESPN
(1)
Farhi
(1)
fragmentation
(1)
free content
(2)
Free vs. fee
(1)
freeconomics
(1)
Gauntlett
(1)
GE
(1)
Ghosh
(1)
google
(7)
HMF
(7)
HMF and Cringely
(1)
HMF Chapter 11
(1)
incidental exposure
(1)
Industry Map
(1)
inferior good
(1)
information overload
(1)
instructor
(6)
iris chyi
(1)
James Moore
(1)
jarvis
(1)
journal article critique
(2)
Journalist
(1)
Kang
(12)
Kate. West
(1)
Kate.West
(11)
Kelly
(18)
Kelly's portfolio
(1)
kim
(2)
Len Downie
(1)
littlerice
(12)
Long Tail
(2)
Longtail
(2)
mainstream
(1)
Malcolm Gladwell
(3)
management
(1)
media choice
(1)
media creation
(1)
media stock competition
(1)
micro payment
(1)
micropayments
(1)
microsoft
(2)
mini-laptops
(1)
Myllylahti
(1)
netbooks
(1)
new economic models
(1)
new media studies
(2)
New York Times
(2)
News Corp.
(1)
newspaper
(4)
newspaper project
(1)
newspapers
(5)
no business model? sung woo
(2)
NY Times
(1)
online news
(1)
online-only
(1)
ownership
(1)
paid content
(1)
participation business model
(1)
Patterson
(1)
people
(1)
Pete
(15)
Picard
(8)
Picard chap 8
(1)
Portfolio
(4)
Prensky
(1)
print
(1)
Putnam
(1)
quality
(1)
related posting
(1)
research critique
(3)
response
(1)
Robert G. Picard
(1)
Sandra
(15)
scarcity
(1)
selective exposure
(1)
Sinking Ships
(1)
skepticism
(1)
Stepp
(5)
Stock Picks
(1)
Stocks
(5)
Sung Woo
(10)
sungwoo
(1)
surplus
(2)
theory of the firm
(1)
Thurman
(1)
time to panic
(1)
Ting
(10)
tools of production
(1)
trust
(1)
Twitter
(1)
un-netbooks
(1)
Washington Post
(1)
Web 2.0
(1)
Web measures and Google
(3)
web only
(1)
Wired
(1)
yonghwan
(11)
Blog Archive
▼
2009
(172)
►
11/29 - 12/06
(9)
►
11/15 - 11/22
(1)
►
11/08 - 11/15
(2)
►
11/01 - 11/08
(1)
►
10/25 - 11/01
(20)
►
10/18 - 10/25
(12)
►
10/11 - 10/18
(3)
►
10/04 - 10/11
(15)
▼
09/27 - 10/04
(18)
Two stories on multi-platform audience measurement
Does Information Surplus Lead to Fragmentation?
The questions on attention
Why do people need journalist when information is ...
Information surplus questions
Panic again?
The Internet...news you can count on 24/7
too many to choose
Information deficit and the death of the article
Health-Knowledge Gap ... in new media
My misunderstanding or their mistakes
Ting's stock picks
Incidental exposure to online news
How do you measure knowledge in new media environm...
meaningful or meaningless
Breaking News...politicians like being in the media.
Journal article critique; media skepticism & trust
When supply exceeds demand
►
09/20 - 09/27
(28)
►
09/13 - 09/20
(20)
►
09/06 - 09/13
(26)
►
08/30 - 09/06
(17)
Followers
No comments:
Post a Comment